If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

Why do “censorship-free” social media networks always fail? Well, let’s see. Sit down and think. Think really, really hard.

Nazis.

We don’t have to guess. We know.

Why hasn't Japan legalized same-sex marriage?

Now, say you’re an ordinary person. You don’t like child porn. You’re not a Nazi. You don’t want to shoot up a school or blow up the White House.

If I let you borrow my bike for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to take it back. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

“Censorship-free” social media sites quickly become Nazi bars where people exchange child porn. Normal human beings don’t hang out in Nazi bars with pedophiles.

What's next for the video game industry as Nintendo launches the long-awaited Switch 2 - NPR

Who is the #2 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who else wants that?

That has nothing to do with social media.

You have the right to say what you want. You do not have the right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Do Republicans want to ban books and decide what your kids can and can’t read?

Child pornographers.

Are you going to stay on a social media site that’s all photos of babies being raped, Nazis posting graphic descriptions of finishing what Hitler started, and plans for school shootings?

The #3 user? Terrorists. 8kun was used to plan 3 different school shootings in a 6-month period.

World's Most Famous Waltz to Be Beamed into Space on Composer 200th Birthday, and EU Space Agency's 50th - Good News Network

The #1 problem people who make and consume child pornography have is connecting the producers with the buyers. Any “censorship-free” network quickly gets overrun with child porn. Classic example: 8kun.

So.

Because you’re confusing two different things.

Why Adding More Bananas to Your Diet Could Impact Your Blood Pressure - Prevention

If i let you use my computer network for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to kick you off. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

I hate censorship. That is, I think the government has no place controlling what people say, read, express, or create, except insofar as is necessary to prevent things like terroristic threats, dissemination of classified information, fraud, false advertising, and so on.

Who is the #1 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who most wants that?

Why did Kamala say immigrants eating cats isn’t real when there’s police bodycam footage of it happening?